When you’re starting to drown between employee concerns, payroll duties and helping your CEO -- HR Insider is there to help get the logistical work out of the way.
Need a policy because of a recent regulatory change? We’ve got it for you. Need some quick training on a specific HR topic? We’ve got it for you. HR Insider provides the resources you need to craft, implement and monitor policies with confidence. Our team of experts (which includes lawyers, analysts and HR professionals) keep track of complex legislation, pending changes, new interpretations and evolving case law to provide you with the policies and procedures to keep you ahead of problems. FIND OUT MORE...
SAFETY COORDINATORS: How to Avoid Personal Liability for Safety Violations

Regulatory agencies have stepped up enforcement of OHS laws against companies, corporate directors, supervisors and even workers. But they generally don’t go after safety coordinators, that is, the individuals who actually run the company’s OHS program. However, there have been two successful OHS prosecutions of safety coordinators, both in Nova Scotia. With help from Ryan J. Conlin, a Toronto OHS lawyer, we’ll tell you about these cases and how you can protect yourself from personal liability for safety violations.


The OHS laws impose safety-related duties on owners, employers, contractors, suppliers, supervisors and even workers. (Note that Sec. 20 of Nova Scotia’s OHS Act does impose duties on the providers of OHS services, which could include safety coordinators.) However, don’t be lulled into thinking that the omission of safety coordinators from the list of workplace stakeholders who have safety responsibilities means you can’t be charged with OHS offences. Conlin explains that a safety coordinator could be held liable for a safety offence as:

An employer. Every OHS law defines “employer” and imposes specific health and safety duties on employers. The definition of “employer” is often very broad and may include representatives of the employer in addition to the employer itself. For example, Sec. 122(1) of the federal Canada Labour Code defines “employer” for OHS purposes as “a person who employs one or more employees and includes an employers’ organization and any person who acts on behalf of an employer.” Thus, a safety coordinator who acts on his company’s behalf could be prosecuted as an employer under the OHS laws. In fact, in the Dearing case discussed below, the safety coordinator was prosecuted as an employer.

A worker. The foundation for the OHS laws is the Internal Responsibility System (IRS) in which all workplace stakeholders—including workers—are responsible for workplace safety. So all OHS laws define “workers” or “employees” and impose specific health and safety duties on them. Because safety coordinators are clearly workers under the law, they could be prosecuted for an OHS violation for failing to fulfill their worker duties, says Conlin. And in the Della Valle case discussed below, the safety coordinator was prosecuted as an employee.

A supervisor. Many jurisdictions impose specific safety responsibilities on supervisors. Their definition of “supervisor” varies but typically includes individuals with control over the workplace or authority over workers. So if a safety coordinator had such control or authority, he could be prosecuted as a supervisor for a safety violation. Even though safety coordinators typically don’t supervise workers directly, Conlin warns that certain powers typically associated with supervisory authority, such as the power to discipline workers, may be enough to make a safety coordinator vulnerable to being charged as a supervisor under OHS laws.

Insider Says: Conlin adds that although safety coordinators could theoretically face liability for criminal negligence under the Canadian Criminal Code, it’s “extremely unlikely.”


There have been two notable prosecutions of safety coordinators for OHS violations, both in Nova Scotia:

Dearing Case

The Dearing case was the result of a fatality that occurred during the dismantling of an old steel mill in Sydney, NS. A worker was crushed to death after a 680-kg steel beam being lifted by a crane broke loose from its hoist and hit him in the head. The Crown charged the company’s safety manager, Bernard Dearing, as an “employer” with failing to “establish and maintain a written occupational health and safety program” under the Nova Scotia OHS Act.

In May 2007, Dearing pleaded guilty to a “technical” violation—developing the site safety plan without consulting the company’s JHSC as required by the Act. The court fined Dearing $1,000, noting that his actions didn’t cause the tragedy. Even the prosecutor acknowledged that Dearing’s offence was an administrative error and not directly related to the incident.

Della Valle Case

In the most recent safety coordinator prosecution, James Della Valle, the OHS coordinator for a housing authority, got test results indicating that insulation from attic space contained asbestos. The testing company told him what safety measures to take, which he passed along to two maintenance supervisors. But they didn’t follow through on those measures. Months later, when an electrical contractor learned about the test results, he contacted the Department of Environment & Labour, which charged the housing authority, Della Valle and the maintenance supervisors with OHS violations. (The authority and one supervisor pleaded guilty; the case against the other supervisor is still pending.)

The Nova Scotia Provincial Court convicted Della Valle of violating his “general duty” as an “employee” to protect his own safety and that of co-workers under the OHS Act and fined him $1,000. The court said there was nothing wrong with what Della Valle did—he just didn’t do enough. What he should have done, said the court, was:

  • Immediately report the test results to his supervisor, with whom he met and spoke to regularly;
  • Report the test results to the JHSC, whose meetings he generally attended;
  • Follow up with the maintenance supervisors; and
  • Institute a formal hazard assessment for any work or activity in the areas where the asbestos was present [R v. Della Valle].


Conlin believes that the risk of prosecution for safety coordinators anywhere in Canada is relatively remote. But you should still be proactive and take steps to protect yourself from liability. In many ways, the best way to reduce your liability risk is to simply to do your job as safety coordinator well—that is, implement and manage an OHS system that complies with the OHS laws and effectively protects workers from injuries and illnesses. But despite your best efforts, safety incidents may still happen. So here are three strategies for minimizing your risk of personal liability for such incidents.

Strategy #1: Document Safety Compliance Efforts

In a prosecution, what matters isn’t what you did but what you can prove you did. For example, say you recommended a safety measure that the company failed to implement and a worker got hurt as a result. To avoid personal liability, you may need to be able to show that you gave the appropriate safety information and recommendations to the people in the company with the power to act on them, says Conlin. For safety coordinators to prove that they did so, they’ll need to show that they:

  • Identified the violation or problem;
  • Brought the violation or problem to management’s attention;
  • Recommended measures to address the problem; and
  • Made an earnest effort to get management to adopt those measures.

It would be hard to hold a safety coordinator who could prove these things personally liable for a company’s safety violation. So Conlin recommends that you create a “paper trail” detailing your communication of safety-related information and issues to the people in the company with the authority to address those issues—especially if management ignores your recommendations, he adds. At a minimum, he suggests that you document the following:

  • Responses to all major JHSC recommendations;
  • Responses to safety recommendations from outside experts or consultants;
  • Safety hazards, violations and noncompliance with safety rules or OHS laws that you pointed out to management and how management responded; and
  • Government orders or directives and management’s responses to them.

Strategy #2: Ensure Your Job Description Is Accurate

There should be a description of your job as safety coordinator, whether in your employment contract or employee handbook. Prosecutors and courts might rely on this job description to determine whether to hold you responsible for safety violations committed by your company, says Conlin. For example, the court in Della Valle specifically relied on the OHS coordinator’s job description, which gave him “general responsibility for health and safety within the organization.”

Thus, it’s very important that your job description accurately describes your actual functions, responsibilities and any limits on your authority or power. For example, if you’re not considered a supervisor, the job description should specifically state that you’re not a “supervisor” under your jurisdiction’s OHS law, advises Conlin. But make sure your job description “reflects reality,” he warns. Liability is based on what a safety coordinator actually does, not what the job description says he does. And although a court may consider your job description, it’s not binding. So even if your job description specifically states that you’re not a supervisor, the court may still treat you as one if your actual daily duties reflect those of a supervisor, he explains.

Of course, some safety coordinators may be supervisors as well, particularly in small companies where everyone wears several hats. If you’re in that situation, make sure that your job description accurately reflects these dual duties.

Conlin says that it’s also important to make sure that you’re doing the things for which your job description says you’re responsible. For example, if your job description says you’re responsible for informing the JHSC and senior management of changes in the OHS laws, make sure you stay on top of those laws and document your communication of changes or new requirements to management and the committee. Failing to fulfill your duties as specified in your job description will make it easy for a court to find you liable.

Strategy #3: Get Company to “Indemnify” You

No OHS program is perfect. So despite your best efforts, safety violations or incidents may still occur. If you end up being charged as a result, you want the company to “indemnify” you—that is, defend you and hold you harmless. This request is reasonable because such a prosecution or other legal proceeding will be based on your duties as safety coordinator and thus your work on the company’s behalf, explains Conlin.

So Conlin suggests that you try to get the company to agree to include an indemnification clause in your employment contract. This clause should require the company to do two things:

1. Defend you in any investigation, prosecution or other legal proceeding connected to any workplace injury, illness or safety incident or otherwise stemming from your duties as safety coordinator; and

2. Pay or reimburse you for the legal fees, fines or other expenses you incur in connection with such investigations, prosecutions or other legal proceedings.

Although an indemnification clause is good to have, Conlin says it shouldn’t be a deal breaker for most safety coordinators. But he adds that the more senior you are, the more important such a clause is. Explanation: If you’re the regional OHS manager in charge of safety management for several corporate facilities or the corporate safety compliance officer, he says it’s more likely that prosecutors will target you. So an indemnification clause is more important for those types of safety coordinators than for your average safety coordinator.


Because safety coordinators often have broad responsibility for health and safety in their companies, courts could find them liable when they’re aware of a hazard and don’t ensure that the company takes appropriate steps to address it. Despite the recent Della Valle case, it’s unlikely that prosecutions against safety coordinators will become a regular occurrence. But the threat of prosecution is real. So if you’re a safety coordinator, you need to recognize this risk. The good news is that as long as you do your job professionally, maintain your commitment to protecting the health and safety of your workers and take the risk management strategies described in this article, you’re highly unlikely to face prosecution.


Ryan J. Conlin: Stringer Brisbin Humphrey


R v. Della Valle, [2011] NSPC 67 (CanLII), Sept. 14, 2011