When an OHS Program Is Required – Know the Laws of Your Province
KNOW THE LAWS: When an OHS Program Is Required Here's
KNOW THE LAWS: When an OHS Program Is Required Here's
KNOW THE LAWS: When Medical Monitoring Programs are Required Here's
KNOW THE LAWS: When OHS Inspectors Can Enter Workplaces According
KNOW THE LAWS: Who's Permitted to Work with Explosives Here's
An Ontario company was fined $75,000 for firing a worker who reported a spill. Here's what you can learn from this company's mistake.
Just providing safety training isn't enough. That training must be adequate or it could cost the company.
An Ontario court's frustration with the failure of fines to improve safety recently sentenced an owner to jail.
The Lacombe case shows that just being a member of management or a corporate boardby itselfisnt enough to hold an individual personally liable for the companys environmental offences.
As a recent case shows, companies that engage in misconduct while appealing environmental orders may be forced to pay the costs of the other parties.
Members of senior management who play a hands-on role in the companys daily operations may face liability as supervisors.
When sentencing a defendant for environmental offences, the court will consider its culpability. This case shows recklessness may result in a bigger fine.
A robust EHS program will support a due diligence defence if your company is faced with environmental offences as a result of a spill or other incident.
A new study found that CEOs indirectly influence worker safety by fostering a safety climate in senior management, which trickles down to the lower levels.
The Metron case confirms that the conduct of a someone on a lower level of the company hierarchy can be the basis for criminal liability for the company.