Misconduct in Appealing Environmental Orders Can Be Costly
As a recent case shows, companies that engage in misconduct while appealing environmental orders may be forced to pay the costs of the other parties.
As a recent case shows, companies that engage in misconduct while appealing environmental orders may be forced to pay the costs of the other parties.
Members of senior management who play a hands-on role in the companys daily operations may face liability as supervisors.
When sentencing a defendant for environmental offences, the court will consider its culpability. This case shows recklessness may result in a bigger fine.
A robust EHS program will support a due diligence defence if your company is faced with environmental offences as a result of a spill or other incident.
A new study found that CEOs indirectly influence worker safety by fostering a safety climate in senior management, which trickles down to the lower levels.
The Metron case confirms that the conduct of a someone on a lower level of the company hierarchy can be the basis for criminal liability for the company.
Workers arent the only people in the workplace that companies have a duty to protect. This case is an example of the consequences companies can suffer when they fail to take reasonable steps to protect visitors.
Getting your company's officers to see the value of a robust JHSC.
A company operated a resin production facility on property in
At a manufacturing plant, a worker was operating a vertical
Don't assume that employment agencies are solely responsible for providing safety training for temporary workers.
Relying on outside consultants isnt enough to prove compliance with OHS laws
Explaining how your OHS program personally and directly affects your officers and directors
A licensed outfitter in Saskatchewan hired high school students to