When you’re starting to drown between employee concerns, payroll duties and helping your CEO -- HR Insider is there to help get the logistical work out of the way.
Need a policy because of a recent regulatory change? We’ve got it for you. Need some quick training on a specific HR topic? We’ve got it for you. HR Insider provides the resources you need to craft, implement and monitor policies with confidence. Our team of experts (which includes lawyers, analysts and HR professionals) keep track of complex legislation, pending changes, new interpretations and evolving case law to provide you with the policies and procedures to keep you ahead of problems. FIND OUT MORE...
Do Employers Have to Re-Employ Injured Workers? – Ask The Expert

The human rights law duty to accommodate injured workers applies regardless of what workers comp requires.


Are we legally obligated to re-employ an injured worker returning from a work injury’


Yes, if you determine that there’s suitable work that the worker is capable of doing.


The duty to re-employ injured workers is complicated because it comes from 2 different laws:

  • Workers Comp laws of 8 jurisdictions (MB, NB, NL, NS, ON, PEI, QC and YK) expressly require employers to re-hire workers after they suffer workplace injuries; and
  • Human Rights laws require employers to make accommodations for workers with disabilities.

Keep in mind that most work-related injuries would constitute disabilities under human rights laws. Translation: All injured workers are entitled to accommodations to the point of undue hardship. And unlike workers comp re-employment requirements, the duty to accommodate applies in all parts of Canada. In addition, the limitations that typically apply to workers comp re-employment (for example, they apply only to companies with at least a specific number of employees and to employees with a specific minimum amount of service) don’t apply to accommodation duties.

However, unlike the workers comp laws, the accommodation laws don’t specifically require employers to re-employ their injured workers. That may be a required accommodation; or it may be undue hardship. It all depends on the specific situation, especially the availability of suitable work. The one constant is that employers must at least consider accommodations, specifically by assessing the worker’s capabilities and determining if there are jobs suitable for those capabilities.