When you’re starting to drown between employee concerns, payroll duties and helping your CEO -- HR Insider is there to help get the logistical work out of the way.
Need a policy because of a recent regulatory change? We’ve got it for you. Need some quick training on a specific HR topic? We’ve got it for you. HR Insider provides the resources you need to craft, implement and monitor policies with confidence. Our team of experts (which includes lawyers, analysts and HR professionals) keep track of complex legislation, pending changes, new interpretations and evolving case law to provide you with the policies and procedures to keep you ahead of problems. FIND OUT MORE...
Respirators v. Religion: Religious Objections to No-Beard Policies

On Sept. 1, 2021, BC became the first province to require employers to review each area of a job site when determining if a person must wear head protection in that area. The idea is to enable employers to avoid having to force workers of the Sikh faith to remove their turbans and don a hardhat. The message: While if push comes to shove, an employer’s OHS duty to ensure a safe workplace takes precedence over its human rights law duty to accommodate workers’ religious beliefs religious accommodations, employers must take reasonable measures to prevent a push-comes-to-shove situation.

Oddly, the new BC regulation is limited to the OHS duty to wear a hardhat and doesn’t apply to the parallel situation where workers required to wear tight-fitting respirators refuse to shave their beards for religious reasons. Even so, the principles are the same.

Consider the recent Alberta case where a scaffolding worker claimed his employer’s demand to shave his beard before using the tight-fitting respirator required for handling hazardous solvents violated his religious accommodation rights. The Alberta Human Rights Commission concluded that the requirement was a valid safety measure that the employer applied to all workers using tight-fitting respirators requiring a clean shave to create an effective seal. Moreover, the employer did accommodate the worker by removing tasks requiring respirator use from his job duties [Kaynak v Milestone Scaffolding Ltd., 2021 AHRC 169 (CanLII), September 15, 2021].