Home › Forums › Community › Required information to be provided to "committee" for violent incident – Ontario
-
AuthorPosts
-
Forum: Community
In regulation 420/21 (under OHSA Ontario), the employer has to submit, within four days, a report to the committee and the union. The employer would do this, for example if after a violent incident the worker went home for the afternoon or ended up being off longer and WSIB paperwork was completed. The question is this: According to Section 3(2), that report must include the name of the worker, injury (may be mental health), and the name of the medical practitioner (which could be a psychologist). We are not comfortable giving this information to the entire committee and the union. To get it out in four days, it will have to be electronically. Our practice has been to give it to the co-chairs only, and the union president. The union is asking that the entire committee receive these. Is the employer within their rights under privacy legislation to redact personal information?
Great questions.
1. CAN YOU REDACT: PROBABLY NOT
First, I think it’s clear that the reports you submit to MOL and WSIB must include ALL of the required information. But what about the JHSC’ Names and physicians of incident victims is personal information protected by privacy laws, meaning you can’t disclose it without consent. However, exceptions apply, like when disclosure is required by regulation. I’ve seen OHS reporting requirements in other jurisdictions that require employers to redact the names and identifying information of victims of certain types of incidents in the copy of the report given to the JHSC. Unfortunately, Ontario doesn’t say this. I think it should. But it doesn’t. So, redacting that information would likely violate the OHS Act and reporting regulation.
2. CAN YOU LIMIT DISCLOSURE TO CHAIRS: NO
Again, there are many jurisdictions where employers need give a copy of the incident report only to the JHSC co-chairs. But the Ontario rules require notifying “the committee.” So, I don’t think there’s any basis for just giving the report to co-chairs.
Man, this is frustrating because I think the Ontario laws are overly broad and compromise workers’ privacy. Of course, this is just a personal opinion and it could be wrong. It might be worth running the question past somebody from the MOL or WSIB to get their take. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.