When you’re starting to drown between employee concerns, payroll duties and helping your CEO -- HR Insider is there to help get the logistical work out of the way.
Need a policy because of a recent regulatory change? We’ve got it for you. Need some quick training on a specific HR topic? We’ve got it for you. HR Insider provides the resources you need to craft, implement and monitor policies with confidence. Our team of experts (which includes lawyers, analysts and HR professionals) keep track of complex legislation, pending changes, new interpretations and evolving case law to provide you with the policies and procedures to keep you ahead of problems. FIND OUT MORE...
Dos & Don’ts: Don’t Start Work Before Environmental Assessment Is Complete

Construction Near WaterIf your company is planning to engage in a major development project, such as building a new plant or expanding an existing one, it might need to get an environmental assessment first. An assessment’s goal is to determine a proposed project’s potential impact on the environment and identify the measures the developers must take to eliminate or reduce the risk of harm to the environment. The assessment process can be time-consuming and burdensome. So you may get tired of waiting and start work before it’s complete. But resist the temptation to jump the gun because doing so could be costly.

A company in Alberta learned this lesson the hard way. It applied to various federal and Alberta government departments for approvals related to its proposed construction of an inland marina development on the shore of a lake. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (Fisheries) concluded that the proposed project needed an authorization and environmental assessment, which began in October 2009. But in the spring of 2010, Fisheries was notified that the company had excavated the lakebed and damaged spawning and rearing habitat for many species of fish—before the environmental assessment was complete and a Fisheries Act authorization was issued. The company pleaded guilty to violating the Fisheries Act. The court fined it $8,500 and ordered it to pay $81,000 to the Environmental Damages Fund and $500 to the Alberta Conservation Association [R.J. Williscroft Contracting Ltd., Govt. News Release, Jan. 31, 2012].