When you’re starting to drown between employee concerns, payroll duties and helping your CEO -- HR Insider is there to help get the logistical work out of the way.
Need a policy because of a recent regulatory change? We’ve got it for you. Need some quick training on a specific HR topic? We’ve got it for you. HR Insider provides the resources you need to craft, implement and monitor policies with confidence. Our team of experts (which includes lawyers, analysts and HR professionals) keep track of complex legislation, pending changes, new interpretations and evolving case law to provide you with the policies and procedures to keep you ahead of problems. FIND OUT MORE...
Company Liable Because Comfort Letter ≠ Certificate of Compliance

A company that previously owned and polluted land was held liable under the Environmental Management Act for approximately $4.75 million in remediation costs incurred by the current owner in the process of fulfilling regulatory requirements to develop the land. The company appealed the order, arguing that it should be exempt from liability because a ‘comfort letter’ it got from the regulator in the 1980s stating that the remediation it carried out at that time was to a satisfactory standard was legally equivalent to a certificate of compliance. The appeals court dismissed the challenge. The comfort letter didn’t satisfy the law’s definition of ‘a certificate of compliance.’ That’s because the remediation the company did in the 1980s wasn’t done to the standards required by the regulations, explained the appeals court [J.I. Properties Inc. v. PPG Architectural Coatings Canada Ltd., [2015] BCCA 472 (CanLII), Nov. 20, 2015].