When you’re starting to drown between employee concerns, payroll duties and helping your CEO -- HR Insider is there to help get the logistical work out of the way.
Need a policy because of a recent regulatory change? We’ve got it for you. Need some quick training on a specific HR topic? We’ve got it for you. HR Insider provides the resources you need to craft, implement and monitor policies with confidence. Our team of experts (which includes lawyers, analysts and HR professionals) keep track of complex legislation, pending changes, new interpretations and evolving case law to provide you with the policies and procedures to keep you ahead of problems. FIND OUT MORE...
Quiz: Spot the Privacy Violation

SITUATION

Khantay Jeuss notifies her supervisor that she’s just tested positive for COVID-19 coronavirus. The supervisor orders her to go home immediately, talk to a doctor and stay in self-isolation for at least 14 days. But before she leaves, he asks Khantay for the names of any employees with whom she’s had close contact, i.e., within 6 feet/2 meters, in the past 48 hours. He then calls every co-worker listed, lets them know that Khantay has COVID-19 and orders them to also go into self-isolation for 14 days.

QUESTION

What, if anything, did the supervisor do wrong’
A. Order Khantay to go home and self-isolate
B. Order Khantay to reveal the names of co-workers with whom she had close contact
C. Tell the listed co-workers that Khantay has COVID-19
D. Order the potentially exposed co-workers to go home

ANSWER

C. The supervisor did everything right except for disclosing Khantay’s illness to her co-workers.

EXPLANATION

The fact that Khantay tested positive for COVID-19 is personal information that can’t be disclosed without Khantay’s consent. However, consent isn’t required if the disclosure serves a legitimate employment purpose and the personal information disclosed is limited to the minimum necessary to accomplish that purpose.

The supervisor disclosed Khantay’s diagnosis to her co-workers to protect their health and safety and ensure social distancing during the pandemic. And while that’s a legitimate purpose, the supervisor could have achieved that objective simply by notifying Khantay’s colleagues that someone with whom they had close contact tested positive without mentioning Khantay by name. So, C is the right answer.

WHY WRONG ANSWERS ARE WRONG

A is wrong because ordering employees and others who are confirmed to have (or even just exhibit symptoms of) COVID-19 is something employers are required to do under current public health guidelines.

B is wrong because the guidelines also call on employers to identify the people in the workplace with whom the person with COVID-19 has had close contact within the past 48 hours of testing positive.

D is wrong because, once more, the guidelines mandate that employers bar entry to individuals that have had close contact with somebody who has COVID-19 within 48 hours. Exception: Under revised CDC guidelines, health care and critical infrastructure workers that are ‘potentially exposed’ the way Khantay’s colleagues were, can keep working as long as they’re asymptomatic, wear a respiratory mask at all times, follow social distancing protocols and self-monitor. But when and if they exhibit COVID-19 symptoms, they have to go home and self-isolate.