According to Ontario’s Ministry of Labour (MOL), the province has reduced its annual rate of workplace injuries by 20% or more than 50,000 incidents thanks to a four-year compliance program. As a result, the MOL claims that Ontario employers have saved about $5 billion in direct and indirect costs during those four years. Although the Ontario government has a penchant for patting itself on the back, the fact remains that the MOL initiative is cutting edge and measurably successful. And now the province has launched a new program hoping to build on its success. The MOL’s new workplace safety plan, Safe at Work Ontario, is another four-year plan that emphasizes both worker safety and the increased productivity that safe workplaces bring to the province’s economy. Although it’s an Ontario initiative, OHS regulators in other parts of Canada could adopt similar strategies. So safety coordinators should be familiar with the new initiative even if their workplace isn’t located in Ontario.
THE PLANThe Strategy: To achieve these goals, the MOL will continue its strategy of targeted workplace inspections. But the new plan sets more flexible identification criteria for such inspections, including (but not limited to):
The MOL will use these factors to develop sector-specific plans that focus on an industry’s particular hazards and characteristics. It’s already developed strategies for industrial, healthcare, construction and mining based on the new selection criteria.
Improvements from Previous Plan:
Although the MOL is trying to build on the success of its previous plan, the new plan has three key improvements from the prior plan:
ANALYSIS
What does this new plan mean for Ontario workplaces? More workplace inspections—and if your company is in a high-risk sector, the increased likelihood that your workplace will be subjected to a targeted inspection, even if it has a solid workplace safety and compliance track record. The MOL is specifically not limiting its inspections to workplaces with injury records. It’s also focusing on workplaces with a higher risk of injury because of the hazards inherent in the work being done there. Plus, the improved connections with health and safety associations is a two-edged sword. MOL inspectors can refer a company to such an association for additional assistance and training. But if the company doesn’t “demonstrate an acceptable response” to the association’s input, the association can refer the company to the MOL for inspection. Ontario is already more aggressive than other provinces and territories in terms of OHS enforcement. Apparently, its 430 full-time health and safety inspectors can expect to be even busier.